23.7 C
Washington

$5 billion Google lawsuit over ‘incognito mode’ tracking moves a step closer to trial

Date:

Share:


On Monday, a California judge denied Google’s request for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by users alleging the company illegally invaded the privacy of millions of people. The people suing Google say that occurred because Google’s cookies, analytics, and tools in apps continued to track internet browsing activity even after users activated Incognito mode Chrome, or other similar features like Safari’s private browsing expecting a certain level of privacy. However, the truth is, as we wrote in 2018, “What isn’t private: private browsing mode.”

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers pointed to statements in the Chrome privacy notice, Privacy Policy, Incognito Splash Screen, and Search & Browse Privately Help page about how incognito mode limits the information stored or how people can control the information they share, writing, “Taken as a whole, a triable issue exists as to whether these writings created an enforceable promise that Google would not collect users’ data while they browsed privately.”

Another issue against Google’s arguments that the judge mentioned is that the plaintiffs have evidence Google “stores users’ regular and private browsing data in the same logs; it uses those mixed logs to send users personalized ads; and, even if the individual data points gathered are anonymous by themselves, when aggregated, Google can use them to ‘uniquely identify a user with a high probability of success.’”

She also responded to a Google argument that the plaintiffs didn’t suffer economic injury, writing that “Plaintiffs have shown that there is a market for their browsing data and Google’s alleged surreptitious collection of the data inhibited plaintiffs’ ability to participate in that market… Finally, given the nature of Google’s data collection, the Court is satisfied that money damages alone are not an adequate remedy. Injunctive relief is necessary to address Google’s ongoing collection of users’ private browsing data.”

The lawsuit was filed in 2020, seeking “at least” $5 billion in damages, and as reported by Mike Swift for MLex, the ruling was not entirely surprising, as the judge had indicated she’d do so, but it is a big one as it moves the case closer toward settlement or a trial.





Source link

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

The FDA lost a whistleblower complaint about unsanitary conditions at an infant formula plant for a year, auditors revealed

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration took more than 15 months to act on a whistleblower complaint it received about conditions at an...

Donald Trump aims to entice CEOs with lucrative tax cuts while Biden wants to win them over by vowing to maintain stability

Former President Donald Trump told an influential group of CEOs that he wants to further cut the corporate tax rate he lowered while...

A 58-year-old Canadian man stole trade secrets from Tesla and tried to sell them on YouTube, authorities say

A Canadian national who lives in China pleaded guilty on Thursday to conspiring to sell secrets he stole from Tesla to market battery...

Yahoo resurrects Artifact inside a new AI-powered News app

Artifact is dead, long live Yahoo’s version of Artifact. The architecture behind Artifact, the news aggregation app built by Instagram co-founders Kevin Systrom...

Microsoft’s all-knowing Recall AI feature is being delayed

Microsoft is planning to launch its new Copilot Plus PCs next week without its controversial Recall feature that screenshots everything you do on...