Wells Fargo exec in accounts scandal deserves jail time, say prosecutors: ‘Corporate wrongdoers must be sent a clear message’

Date:

Share:

[ad_1]

Wells Fargo & Co.’s former head of retail banking should spend a year in prison for impeding a probe of the bank’s practice of opening millions of accounts for customers without their authorization, prosecutors said.

Carrie L. Tolstedt, the only executive at the bank to be accused of criminal wrongdoing stemming from its fake-accounts scandal of 2016, agreed this year to plead guilty to obstructing the investigation. Now the judge handling the case must decide how severely she should be punished. The US Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles weighed in late Friday.

Tolstedt “attempted to conceal from regulators one of the biggest banking scandals in modern history,” prosecutors said in a court filing. “Corporate wrongdoers must be sent a clear message that maintaining a lucrative position through criminal behavior is not worth the risk.”

Wells Fargo paid $3 billion in penalties in 2020 over its widespread practice of opening checking and credit accounts without customers’ authorization to meet aggressive sales goals. The bank said it found employees may have created 3.5 million bogus accounts. Wells Fargo has also been embroiled in other consumer spats over unwanted car insurance, mortgage lending and overdraft fees. It promised to improve in the wake of the scandals.

A recommendation by the US Probation Office that Tolstedt serve a three-year term of probation doesn’t reflect the seriousness of her crime, the US Attorney’s Office argued.

Enu Mainigi, Tolstedt’s lawyer, didn’t immediately respond to an email message outside regular business hours seeking comment. The attorney will get a chance to offer her alternative to prosecutors’ suggestion.

Tolstedt hindered an examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency by failing to disclose statistics on the number of employees who were fired or resigned pending investigation for sales practices misconduct, prosecutors said. She also failed to disclose that the bank pro-actively investigated only a very small percentage of employees who engaged in activity flagged as potential sales practices misconduct, according to the government.

In her plea deal, Tolstedt agreed to a ban on working in the banking industry and to pay a $17 million civil penalty to the OCC. Under the agreement she signed, she faced as long as 16 months in prison.

The case is US v. Tolstedt, 23-cr-115, US District Court, Central District of California (Los Angeles).

Subscribe to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up today.

[ad_2]

Source link

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Fire Watch Guard Duties: What They Actually Do When Safety Is on the Line

If your fire alarm system goes down in a commercial building, you don’t get to wait and see what happens. In most U.S. cities,...

Sports Betting Reddit Trends: What Smart Bettors Are Doing Differently

Introduction Over the past few years, Reddit has become one of the most active platforms for bettors looking to improve their strategies. What started as...

The Rise of Specialist Executive Recruitment Firms in the UK

Finding the right senior leader has never been easy. But in today’s fast-moving UK business environment, it has become even harder. Companies face rapid digital...

Why Non-Executive Directors Are Essential for Strong Governance and Business Growth

Did you know that companies with effective non-executive directors (NEDs) can outperform their competitors by up to 20%? This remarkable statistic underscores the vital...

What Canadian Bettors Look for in a Great Sports Betting Experience

What Canadian Bettors Look for in a Great Sports Betting Experience Sports betting has grown quickly across Canada. From casual fans placing weekend wagers to...