Elon Musk sends fired Twitter employees to arbitration, then he just doesn’t show up, new lawsuit claims

Date:

Share:

[ad_1]

Twitter Inc. is refusing to engage in arbitration with ex-employees who were fired when Elon Musk took over the company after pushing them to use that process to resolve claims that they weren’t paid, didn’t get promised severance, or were discriminated against, according to a lawsuit.

The company now known as X Corp. has been accused in multiple suits of numerous labor and workplace violations, including its failure to pay thousands of workers laid off late last year after Musk’s acquisition. About 2,000 former Twitter employees have resorted to fighting their claims in arbitration as the company has demanded — but Twitter hasn’t shown up, according to a complaint filed Monday in San Francisco federal court. 

Shannon Liss-Riordan, a lawyer representing former Twitter employees, said she continues to file arbitrations and is fielding calls from current employees filing such claims who argue the company hasn’t paid last year’s bonuses. 

The social media platform won a ruling in January requiring workers who had signed arbitration agreements to resolve their grievances in closed-door hearings overseen by private judges instead of through a class-action lawsuit in open court. It’s the legal equivalent of hand-to-hand combat, usually against a better-armed and financed opponent. Studies have shown that a benefit for companies is that workers will often give up rather than pursue their fight in arbitration.

Realizing the expense required for Twitter to arbitrate the claims, as required by its employment agreements, the company is now refusing to do so, Liss-Riordan said. “Now that it has made its bed, it doesn’t want to lie in it,” she added. Liss-Riordan represents Twitter workers in several suits against the company.

Twitter declined to comment.

Musk fired about half of Twitter’s 7,500 workers in November, following his $44 billion purchase of the company. Layoffs continued into 2023, reportedly bringing the company’s headcount under 2,000.

The case is Fabien Ho Ching Ma v. Twitter, 23-cv-03301, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

Subscribe to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up today.

[ad_2]

Source link

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Sports Betting Reddit Trends: What Smart Bettors Are Doing Differently

Introduction Over the past few years, Reddit has become one of the most active platforms for bettors looking to improve their strategies. What started as...

The Rise of Specialist Executive Recruitment Firms in the UK

Finding the right senior leader has never been easy. But in today’s fast-moving UK business environment, it has become even harder. Companies face rapid digital...

Why Non-Executive Directors Are Essential for Strong Governance and Business Growth

Did you know that companies with effective non-executive directors (NEDs) can outperform their competitors by up to 20%? This remarkable statistic underscores the vital...

What Canadian Bettors Look for in a Great Sports Betting Experience

What Canadian Bettors Look for in a Great Sports Betting Experience Sports betting has grown quickly across Canada. From casual fans placing weekend wagers to...

How Professional Bettors Manage Risk and Bankroll

Professional betting is often misunderstood. Many assume success comes from predicting winners more accurately than everyone else. In reality, long-term profitability depends far more...