23.7 C

Opinion | The Racial Redistricting of Alabama



The Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday in an election case from Alabama—a case that could decide how far the federal courts can go when they require state legislatures to consider race in drawing boundaries for congressional and state legislative districts.

At issue is Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits states from abridging on the basis of race the right to vote. The plaintiffs in this current case, Merrill v. Milligan—along with those in a companion case, Merrill v. Caster—are legislators and advocacy groups that claim the VRA requires the state to consider race as a major factor in mapping districts, while Alabama claims that maps should be drawn on a race-neutral basis.

Source link

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Donald Trump aims to entice CEOs with lucrative tax cuts while Biden wants to win them over by vowing to maintain stability

Former President Donald Trump told an influential group of CEOs that he wants to further cut the corporate tax rate he lowered while...

A 58-year-old Canadian man stole trade secrets from Tesla and tried to sell them on YouTube, authorities say

A Canadian national who lives in China pleaded guilty on Thursday to conspiring to sell secrets he stole from Tesla to market battery...

Yahoo resurrects Artifact inside a new AI-powered News app

Artifact is dead, long live Yahoo’s version of Artifact. The architecture behind Artifact, the news aggregation app built by Instagram co-founders Kevin Systrom...

Microsoft’s all-knowing Recall AI feature is being delayed

Microsoft is planning to launch its new Copilot Plus PCs next week without its controversial Recall feature that screenshots everything you do on...

Elon Musk’s $46 billion told-ya-so: love for ‘incredible’ shareholders, dunks on New York investors, and the promise of a 110x increase in value

Elon Musk walked out on stage and did a celebratory jumping jack. His arms stretched wide over his head as he hopped in...